Agimat FX® MetaTrader 5 · Non-repaint

Home  /  Guides

Agimat FX review: from the person who built it

I made Agimat FX, so this cannot be a review and you should not read it as one. It is the record — including the parts that do not flatter me — and a test you can run yourself instead of trusting any of it.

Last updated 2026-10-05

I built Agimat FX, so this is not a review and you should not read it as one. What follows is the record — what the old versions did and did not deliver, what I did about it, and how to judge the new one yourself without trusting a word of this.

If you searched for an Agimat FX review you are really asking one of three things: does it work, is it a scam, and is it worth paying for. Those deserve straight answers from the person responsible, even where the answers are not flattering.

The record on the old versions

Five versions ran on MetaTrader 4 between 2016 and roughly 2023 — Pro, 2018, 2020, Ultra and iQ.

They did not reach the signal quality I wanted. I rebuilt and re-released repeatedly trying to close that gap, and each time the improvement was marginal. The full account is on the versions page, including why I eventually concluded the constraint was MT4 itself rather than my own logic.

If you bought a later version because the version number implied a step change, that gap was real. I am not going to argue with anyone who felt it.

“Is Agimat FX a scam?”

It is a fair question to ask about any trading product, and the honest answer requires separating two things that get collapsed together.

A scam takes money for something that does not exist, or that is designed not to work. Agimat was real software that really ran on charts and really produced signals, sold by someone using his own name, with support attached.

A product can be real and still underdeliver. That is the honest charge against the MT4 versions, and I have accepted it above rather than disputing it.

What I did when it became clear is the part I would ask you to weigh: I stopped selling. I did not licence the line on to resellers, did not keep it quietly on sale while the problem went unfixed, and did not rebadge it as a new product. I pulled it and went back to the drawing board for two years. You can decide for yourself whether that is the behaviour of someone running a scam.

What I am not claiming about the new one

The MetaTrader 5 rebuild is in live testing. That means:

If you ever see those things attached to the Agimat name, check whether you are actually on agimatfx.com. Most of what carries the name online is not mine.

How to judge it without trusting me

The useful part of any review is a test you can run yourself. For an indicator, there is one that matters more than the rest, and it takes a morning:

  1. Put it on a live chart on a demo account.
  2. Write down the clock time you first see each signal appear — not the bar it is sitting on.
  3. Later, compare your notes against where the arrows now sit.

If an arrow sits on the 10:00 bar but you first saw it at 10:45, the chart you are being shown never existed while it was tradeable. The full method, and why most “non-repaint” claims only address the easy half of the problem, is on this page.

Run that on my indicator when it ships. Run it on everything else you are considering too.

Where to find opinions that are not mine

You should not take a developer's word on his own product, so look elsewhere as well:

So: should you wait for it?

If you want an indicator with a published win rate and a launch discount counting down, I do not have one and will not pretend to. If you would rather watch something be tested in public and judge it with your own eyes when it arrives, leave your address below.